International Context of HRM- Individual Project (3000 words) Essay

International Context of HRM- Individual Project (3000 words) - Essay manikin2008). This approach, the authors claim, does not negate Hofstedes four-dimensional approach to categorize a particular culture (G. Hofstede, The heathen relativity of organizational practices and theories 1983) but actually supplements it. The authors are firmly of the opinion that mere judging a culture through the prism of Hofstedes matrix would hardly provide a proper locating for an international manager. A reasonable knowledge of bilateral history is in addition extremely necessary to successfully overcome deep seated prejudices, biases and negative stereotypes that seem to cloud judgment in a genuinely big way among participating groups. However, Hofstedes cultural matrix, which is further crystallized into cultural distance (Kogut & Singh, 1988), for certain remains oneness of the most influential guidelines on this issue. Theories of Hofstede and Trompenaars compared and contrasted with refer ence to other(a) relevant theories Gerard Hofstedes nurse Survey Model classifies cultures with reference to four dimensions that are power distance, uncertainty avoidance, and individuality versus sovietism and maleness versus femininity (Hofstede, The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories 1983). Trompenaars on the other hand offers an analytical framework ground on seven criterions that are universalistic versus particularistic, neutral versus affective, specific versus diffuse, achievement versus ascription, individualism versus communitarianism and attitudes towards time and the environment (Trompenaars 1994). Out of these seven dimensions, at least two seem to closely replicate Hofstedes apprehension of individuality versus collectivism while somewhat resembling the concept of power distance. Trompenaars description of how an individual is accorded status in a society has a close link to Hofstedes power distance index if one assumes that status is ac corded more due to nature or else than achievement. However, the match is not exact as Hofstede also dwells at length on acceptable power distances within a society, an issue that is not discussed by Trompenaars at all. Further, the neutral versus affective criterion postulated by Trompenaars is more of a behavioural feature rather than a criterion itself. The extent to which an individual would express their feelings is more of a dependent on other panoramas of a culture instead of being in aspect by itself. Trompenaars universalistic versus particularistic aspect that is reflected in a preference for rules and stipulations rather understanding and trust resembles both uncertainty avoidance criterions to a large extent while at the same time having some similarity with individuality versus collectivism as espoused by Hofstede. However, the specific versus diffuse aspect of Trompenaars has no direct parallel in Hofstedes cultural dimensions. Trompenaars criterion of attitudes towa rds